Skip to main content

WCCO CBS Interview: Questions Surround Minnesota Courts Reopening



MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — Minnesota courts have seen most cases put on hold until at least June.
And there’s concern from attorneys and potential jurors as to what courtrooms might look like when they re-open.
Right now, some court hearings are happening virtually, but that won’t be an option when jury trials resume.
“The problem is no one knows what will happen after the stay-at-home order is lifted,” said attorney Joe Tamburino.
Tamburino worries that judicial districts and counties across the state aren’t on the same page.
His concerns center around social distancing in a building like the Hennepin County Government Center. He calls them simple things that are no longer simple such as- how many people can be in the building at one time going forward? And how many people can be in an elevator together?
“Think about this- you have 20,000 potential jurors coming in and out of that building,” said Tamburino. “All these jurors- are they going to wear masks? Who is going to provide them the masks? How are we going to social distance the jurors when we are in a trial?”
On Friday, Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie Gildea issued a new order that virtual hearings will continue and in-person restrictions will remain in place through May 18. Jury trials also won’t resume until at least June 1st. In the meantime, they are working with state health officials and others to develop a plan to re-open. When that happens, Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman thinks only the 4 largest courtrooms in the government center will have trials.
“Which will enable jurors to be seated perhaps in the spectator’s section with more distancing,” said Freeman.
And Freeman believes that initially, only about 10% to 15% of necessary court personnel will return.
“Minnesotans are good people and they care about the juror’s safety. So we are working on that and it’s taking a little while to plan for it,” said Freeman.
Freeman said there will be a case backlog, but not as much as initially thought because some cases have been settled during the Stay at Home Order and others will be tried in court without a jury.

Full story:
https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2020/05/05/coronavirus-in-minnesota-uncertainty-about-jury-trials-lingers-due-to-covid-19/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tamburino Talks Law: Rollercoaster Last Days of Trump Administration - Pardons, Impeachment and Resignation?

  Many predictions are being made about the rollercoaster final days of the Trump presidency. Could the president issue mass pardons? What are the implications of impeachment? And, could in a last minute move the president resign and be pardoned like President Nixon? Here is my take in Tamburino Talks Law

Tamburino Talks Law: Minnesota on New York State Travel Advisory List

Click Here to Listen to Tamburino Talks Law: Minnesota on New York State Travel  Advisory  List  Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York recently added Minnesota to the list of approximately 22 states that are part of  New York  special travel advisories and quarantine rules.   New York  decided that any person traveling to  New York  from a state that has a positive Covid-19 testing rate in excess of 10%, or a number of positive cases exceeding 10 per 100,000 residents, based on a 7 day rolling average, must self quarantine for 14 days before they are allowed to travel freely within  New York  state.  There are exceptions for essential workers (such as health care professionals), and for people who are simply traveling through  New York  and would only be in the state for less than 24 hours.  The new rules also differentiate airline travel from non-airline travel.  First, if you fly into any airport in  New York...

Suspending Constitutional Rights During COVID-19

U.S. Attorney General William Barr is now asking Congress to suspend parts of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees all individuals the right to a speedy and fair trial, the right to bail, and the right to due process under the law.  He makes this utterly absurd request under the guise of the Covid-19 emergency. He wants the chief judge of each federal district to be empowered to decide which people to hold indefinitely without bail or trial and continue all sorts of other hearings and trials both criminal and civil.   Suspending such constitutional rights is completely unnecessary since our justice system can easily adapt (as we are seeing in many parts of the country today) to the new realities of physical distancing, limiting gatherings, dispensing with in-person contact visitation with inmates, and continuing trials and hearings for periods of time when necessary.   In fact, here in Minnesota, our courts are adapting very well.  We’re d...