Skip to main content

Suspending Constitutional Rights During COVID-19





U.S. Attorney General William Barr is now asking Congress to suspend parts of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees all individuals the right to a speedy and fair trial, the right to bail, and the right to due process under the law.  He makes this utterly absurd request under the guise of the Covid-19 emergency. He wants the chief judge of each federal district to be empowered to decide which people to hold indefinitely without bail or trial and continue all sorts of other hearings and trials both criminal and civil.  
Suspending such constitutional rights is completely unnecessary since our justice system can easily adapt (as we are seeing in many parts of the country today) to the new realities of physical distancing, limiting gatherings, dispensing with in-person contact visitation with inmates, and continuing trials and hearings for periods of time when necessary.  
In fact, here in Minnesota, our courts are adapting very well.  We’re doing phone conferences for parties; video appearances for attorneys and litigants; video and/or non in-person attorney meetings with in-custody clients; short trial continuances for some civil cases and out-of-custody criminal cases, and lowering bails and imposing more out-of-custody conditions for people in the jails.
But I don’t think A.G. Barr’s request is about his distress over whether our court system can handle the burdens of an emergency. Rather, it seems to me that Barr’s position is really a precursor to a possible request by the Trump administration to postpone the 2020 Presidential Election.
Let me set the scene that I hope never happens – it’s August, half of the country is infected with the virus, thousands have died, hospitals are jam packed, medical supplies are almost depleted, unemployment is 30%, and the economy has contracted to a fraction of its usual size.  The President expands his powers under the 1976 National Emergencies Act and declares that the November election must be postponed until the country has healed.  
Congress has the power to override such a declaration and immediately terminate the President’s emergency powers by passing a joint resolution.  But if both houses don’t agree, which is likely in our highly partisan political climate, the process could take months to hash out in conference committees.  The general election would, therefore, be postponed for some completely unknown period. 
This is not some fanciful scenario but a possible reality that we must all be prepared for and concerned about.  Our Presidential Election has never been postponed – not even during our civil war or world wars – and it must not be postponed over a pandemic.  We have the laws, process, technology, perseverance and tenacity to make sure that we stay the course and keep our national election date.

- Joe  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tamburino Talks Law: George Floyd case and how change of venue request will be determined

  All four defendants in the George Floyd murder case have asked the court for a change of venue due to negative media attention, and many people are wondering “what is venue” and what does it mean to change venue.  Listen here to my full analysis on  Tamburino Talks Law or see my article below. Here’s a quick explanation: Venue means where the crime allegedly happened is where the trial will be held.  For example, if a liquor store is robbed in Blaine, MN, the robbery trial will happen in Anoka County because Blaine is located in Anoka County.  A change of venue is where a court moves the trial from the original county to some other county because the defendant(s) are not likely to receive a fair trial in the original county due to negative pre-trial publicity.   Usually the defense will present evidence to the court such as media studies, polling, and affidavits supporting their contention that the potential jury pool in the original county is prejudiced against the defense because o
Post a Comment
Read more

Tamburino Talks Law: Minnesota on New York State Travel Advisory List

Click Here to Listen to Tamburino Talks Law: Minnesota on New York State Travel  Advisory  List  Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York recently added Minnesota to the list of approximately 22 states that are part of  New York  special travel advisories and quarantine rules.   New York  decided that any person traveling to  New York  from a state that has a positive Covid-19 testing rate in excess of 10%, or a number of positive cases exceeding 10 per 100,000 residents, based on a 7 day rolling average, must self quarantine for 14 days before they are allowed to travel freely within  New York  state.  There are exceptions for essential workers (such as health care professionals), and for people who are simply traveling through  New York  and would only be in the state for less than 24 hours.  The new rules also differentiate airline travel from non-airline travel.  First, if you fly into any airport in  New York  you will be greeted by official personnel who will question you about where you tr
Post a Comment
Read more

Tamburino Talks Law: Q&A "Should Elections be Suspended Due to COVID-19? What is the precedent?"

Sometimes during periods of great crisis people in powerful positions have some bad ideas. One of those bad ideas floating around now is the issue of whether we should postpone the general election. That’s a bad idea. We have never postponed a presidential election. Not during the Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Great Depression, civil unrests, or pandemics have we ever postponed or suspended a presidential election. Our political system is strong and can adapt to all sorts of serious problems that may occur. Our right to vote is sacrosanct in the Constitution and nothing should stop or delay our vote in any election, especially a presidential election.
Post a Comment
Read more