Skip to main content

Suspending Constitutional Rights During COVID-19





U.S. Attorney General William Barr is now asking Congress to suspend parts of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees all individuals the right to a speedy and fair trial, the right to bail, and the right to due process under the law.  He makes this utterly absurd request under the guise of the Covid-19 emergency. He wants the chief judge of each federal district to be empowered to decide which people to hold indefinitely without bail or trial and continue all sorts of other hearings and trials both criminal and civil.  
Suspending such constitutional rights is completely unnecessary since our justice system can easily adapt (as we are seeing in many parts of the country today) to the new realities of physical distancing, limiting gatherings, dispensing with in-person contact visitation with inmates, and continuing trials and hearings for periods of time when necessary.  
In fact, here in Minnesota, our courts are adapting very well.  We’re doing phone conferences for parties; video appearances for attorneys and litigants; video and/or non in-person attorney meetings with in-custody clients; short trial continuances for some civil cases and out-of-custody criminal cases, and lowering bails and imposing more out-of-custody conditions for people in the jails.
But I don’t think A.G. Barr’s request is about his distress over whether our court system can handle the burdens of an emergency. Rather, it seems to me that Barr’s position is really a precursor to a possible request by the Trump administration to postpone the 2020 Presidential Election.
Let me set the scene that I hope never happens – it’s August, half of the country is infected with the virus, thousands have died, hospitals are jam packed, medical supplies are almost depleted, unemployment is 30%, and the economy has contracted to a fraction of its usual size.  The President expands his powers under the 1976 National Emergencies Act and declares that the November election must be postponed until the country has healed.  
Congress has the power to override such a declaration and immediately terminate the President’s emergency powers by passing a joint resolution.  But if both houses don’t agree, which is likely in our highly partisan political climate, the process could take months to hash out in conference committees.  The general election would, therefore, be postponed for some completely unknown period. 
This is not some fanciful scenario but a possible reality that we must all be prepared for and concerned about.  Our Presidential Election has never been postponed – not even during our civil war or world wars – and it must not be postponed over a pandemic.  We have the laws, process, technology, perseverance and tenacity to make sure that we stay the course and keep our national election date.

- Joe  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tamburino Talks Law: George Floyd case and how change of venue request will be determined

  All four defendants in the George Floyd murder case have asked the court for a change of venue due to negative media attention, and many people are wondering “what is venue” and what does it mean to change venue.  Listen here to my full analysis on  Tamburino Talks Law or see my article below. Here’s a quick explanation: Venue means where the crime allegedly happened is where the trial will be held.  For example, if a liquor store is robbed in Blaine, MN, the robbery trial will happen in Anoka County because Blaine is located in Anoka County.  A change of venue is where a court moves the trial from the original county to some other county because the defendant(s) are not likely to receive a fair trial in the original county due to negative pre-trial publicity.   Usually the defense will present evidence to the court such as media studies, polling, and affidavits supporting their contention that the potential jury pool in the original county is prejud...

Tamburino Talks Law: Gov. Walz Issues Statewide Mask Order

Click Here to Listen to Tamburino Talks Law: Governor Walz Issues Statewide Mask Order When the new rule goes into effect July 25th, Minnesota will be the latest of about 30 states who've introduced similar mask-wearing requirements. Gov. Walz makes it mandatory that anyone older than 2 years old wear a mask when they enter any building or structure that is open to the public.  Such places would include gas stations, stores, coffee shops, public restrooms and schools.   Public and private schools and places of higher-learning are expected to open in some form this fall, and anyone entering those places (students, faculty, staff, or visitors) would need to wear a mask as part of the order.  The order would also apply to anyone in daycare and after-school centers, which means that a 4 year old child in preschool up to a twenty-something student in college would need to wear masks when they’re at school. While individuals can face a misdemeanor fine of up to $100 or a busine...

Tamburino Talks Law: Could the Minneapolis Debate over Police Funding Hit a Veto Wall?

  The death of George Floyd led to calls to dramatically change how public safety is funded in the City of Minneapolis. Now that debate is reaching a new milestone. The Minneapolis City Council and Mayor Jacob Frey are in a budget battle. They're at odds over a series of cuts to the Police Department budget. The cuts are part of a proposal introduced last month by members of the council which takes $7.7 million from the Police Department's budget to fund other public safety programs and initiatives.  Frey is actively considering a budget veto due to the permanent cut to officer capacity. Council members can offer amendments to the budget before voting on the plan Wednesday, December 9th. But that won't be the end of this showdown. Here is my take on how this could all play out in Tamburino Talks Law