Tamburino Talks Law: Ongoing mask discussion and how the Minneapolis requirement works

The ongoing mask discussion is leading to questions around the Minneapolis requirement. I discuss how the requirement works just click here to see my latest Tamburino Talks Law

On May 21^st the Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis issued an executive order mandating that anyone who enters a place of public accommodation must wear a mask. The order took effect at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 26^th, and no end date is stated. There are three issues involved in this order that should be explained.

First, the order is legal. Pursuant to state law, the mayor of Minneapolis, as well as a mayor in any other Minnesota city, has emergency powers that allow him/her to issue emergency orders during a peacetime state of emergency as long as the orders are ratified by the city council. Here in Minnesota, we have been living under Gov. Walz’s peacetime emergency order since March 13^th. Mayor Frey issued the mask order as part of the peacetime emergency and the order was ratified by the Minneapolis City Council. Therefore, the order is legal.

Second, a place of public accommodation is basically any place that is open to the public. Examples of such places are: gas stations, stores, office buildings, skyways, restaurants, bars, breweries, malls, theaters, salons, tobacco shops, churches, synagogues mosques, and the common areas of hotels. It does not include individual hotel rooms, private offices, or any outdoor spaces.

Lastly, the timing of this order is perplexing because the mayor could have issued this order right after Gov. Walz issued a peacetime emergency declaration in March, and the mayor never gave a reason for why he waited so long. Perhaps he was hoping that Covid-19 would dissipate quickly and hospitalization rates would significantly decrease? We don’t know. But, the order now exists and it is a misdemeanor (punishable by up to 90 days in jail and up to $1,000.00 in fines) for any violation.

Comments

Tamburino Talks Law: George Floyd case and how change of venue request will be determined

All four defendants in the George Floyd murder case have asked the court for a change of venue due to negative media attention, and many people are wondering “what is venue” and what does it mean to change venue. Listen here to my full analysis on Tamburino Talks Law or see my article below. Here’s a quick explanation: Venue means where the crime allegedly happened is where the trial will be held. For example, if a liquor store is robbed in Blaine, MN, the robbery trial will happen in Anoka County because Blaine is located in Anoka County. A change of venue is where a court moves the trial from the original county to some other county because the defendant(s) are not likely to receive a fair trial in the original county due to negative pre-trial publicity. Usually the defense will present evidence to the court such as media studies, polling, and affidavits supporting their contention that the potential jury pool in the original county is prejud...

Tamburino Talks Law: Gov. Walz Issues Statewide Mask Order

Click Here to Listen to Tamburino Talks Law: Governor Walz Issues Statewide Mask Order When the new rule goes into effect July 25th, Minnesota will be the latest of about 30 states who've introduced similar mask-wearing requirements. Gov. Walz makes it mandatory that anyone older than 2 years old wear a mask when they enter any building or structure that is open to the public. Such places would include gas stations, stores, coffee shops, public restrooms and schools. Public and private schools and places of higher-learning are expected to open in some form this fall, and anyone entering those places (students, faculty, staff, or visitors) would need to wear a mask as part of the order. The order would also apply to anyone in daycare and after-school centers, which means that a 4 year old child in preschool up to a twenty-something student in college would need to wear masks when they’re at school. While individuals can face a misdemeanor fine of up to $100 or a busine...

Tamburino Talks Law: Could the Minneapolis Debate over Police Funding Hit a Veto Wall?

The death of George Floyd led to calls to dramatically change how public safety is funded in the City of Minneapolis. Now that debate is reaching a new milestone. The Minneapolis City Council and Mayor Jacob Frey are in a budget battle. They're at odds over a series of cuts to the Police Department budget. The cuts are part of a proposal introduced last month by members of the council which takes $7.7 million from the Police Department's budget to fund other public safety programs and initiatives. Frey is actively considering a budget veto due to the permanent cut to officer capacity. Council members can offer amendments to the budget before voting on the plan Wednesday, December 9th. But that won't be the end of this showdown. Here is my take on how this could all play out in Tamburino Talks Law

Tamburino Talks Law

Search This Blog