Skip to main content

Tamburino Talks Law: Pandemic Contact Tracers and Privacy Rights


Hear this Tamburino Talks Law on YouTube
https://youtu.be/4ojdsWCmI0Q

Minnesota is about to embark on a massive contact tracing project to control the spread of Covid-19.  The MN legislature is in the process of passing a bill that would give the MN Dept. of Health the power and funds to trace the contacts of people who either have or were exposed to the virus.  Many people are now asking – is this legal?  What about privacy rights?

The short answer is, yes, it’s legal.  The MN Data Practices Act (the law that controls data collected by the government) and HIPAA (the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) allow the government to share what otherwise would be private health data with other government officials and, in some limited exceptions, with the public to ensure public safety and stop the spread of a contagion.  

For example, on April 10th, Gov. Tim Walz issued an executive order releasing information to first responders concerning the location of Covid-19 infections, which means that a police officer responding to a home would know whether the home has a person infected with the virus.

Also, contact tracing would not violate privacy rights.  A person who has the virus or who was exposed to the virus would not be forced to divulge who they’ve come into contact with. Rather, the person would be asked to voluntarily disclose the information.

Contact tracing is not about violating anyone’s privacy rights; it’s about attempting to control the spread of a serious virus in our communities.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tamburino Talks Law: George Floyd case and how change of venue request will be determined

  All four defendants in the George Floyd murder case have asked the court for a change of venue due to negative media attention, and many people are wondering “what is venue” and what does it mean to change venue.  Listen here to my full analysis on  Tamburino Talks Law or see my article below. Here’s a quick explanation: Venue means where the crime allegedly happened is where the trial will be held.  For example, if a liquor store is robbed in Blaine, MN, the robbery trial will happen in Anoka County because Blaine is located in Anoka County.  A change of venue is where a court moves the trial from the original county to some other county because the defendant(s) are not likely to receive a fair trial in the original county due to negative pre-trial publicity.   Usually the defense will present evidence to the court such as media studies, polling, and affidavits supporting their contention that the potential jury pool in the original county is prejudiced against the defense because o

Tamburino Talks Law: Minnesota on New York State Travel Advisory List

Click Here to Listen to Tamburino Talks Law: Minnesota on New York State Travel  Advisory  List  Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York recently added Minnesota to the list of approximately 22 states that are part of  New York  special travel advisories and quarantine rules.   New York  decided that any person traveling to  New York  from a state that has a positive Covid-19 testing rate in excess of 10%, or a number of positive cases exceeding 10 per 100,000 residents, based on a 7 day rolling average, must self quarantine for 14 days before they are allowed to travel freely within  New York  state.  There are exceptions for essential workers (such as health care professionals), and for people who are simply traveling through  New York  and would only be in the state for less than 24 hours.  The new rules also differentiate airline travel from non-airline travel.  First, if you fly into any airport in  New York  you will be greeted by official personnel who will question you about where you tr

Tamburino Talks Law: Q&A "Should Elections be Suspended Due to COVID-19? What is the precedent?"

Sometimes during periods of great crisis people in powerful positions have some bad ideas. One of those bad ideas floating around now is the issue of whether we should postpone the general election. That’s a bad idea. We have never postponed a presidential election. Not during the Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Great Depression, civil unrests, or pandemics have we ever postponed or suspended a presidential election. Our political system is strong and can adapt to all sorts of serious problems that may occur. Our right to vote is sacrosanct in the Constitution and nothing should stop or delay our vote in any election, especially a presidential election.